Employee empowerment and team work
|
An effective organization
is one that has provided employees the responsibility and authority
to make decisions for nearly all aspects of production and marketing.
Employees that have been empowered generally have better motivation
and self-esteem, an increase a sense of ownership in the business,
and tend to get along better with their colleagues (1).
|
Empowerment works best when
employees need their organization as much as their organization
needs them.
|
Empowerment comes from managerial delegation. In a step-wise progression
managers delegate to supervisors, who in turn delegate to workers.
In effect, extending responsibilities to others greatly expands
a companies' productivity well beyond the capacity of a single business
owner or manager (2). In any sizable business there is simply too
much work for one person to handle. By assigning tasks to employees,
managers are allowing their staff to grow on their own, with the
over-all goal of the improving the business standing.
Advantages of delegation
A manager that delegates responsibility will find that workers will
be eager to create their own goals. Employees will seek out ways
to obtain advanced training, and possibly further education. They
will tend to build a greater interest in their work, or will offer
ways to make it even better. Absenteeism rates generally decline,
as well as conflicts with administration and supervisors.
 |
|
Agricultural workers
collecting Asian lilly bulbs after they have been dug up.
These happen to be specialty cultivars that don't lend themselves
to machine harvesting.
The crew boss leader (standing; in white) can be trusted to
direct the harvesting crew as the work involved is repetitive
and not complex.
With time, and careful mentoring, a crew boss leader can be
empowered to handle more difficult tasks.
|
In a retail business employee empowerment is one of the best sources
of customer satisfaction. When customers receive immediate satisfaction,
and don't feel as if every decision has to be checked with a supervisor,
they will be more inclined to come back for more business. Rather
than hear what can't be done, customers will be pleased to find
what can be done on the spot. In most cases customers will be happy
to settle an issue quickly even it means they are not rewarded 100%
financially.
Problems with delegation
When conflicts arise over delegation it's generally due to supervisors
and employees not understanding their separate roles and responsibilities
(3). Managers may not feel comfortable with the new roles that their
workers assume and feel as if they have lost a certain degree of
recognition. Other supervisors fear that they won't achieve the
results that they had hoped for, and would rather simply do the
task themselves. There are going to be employees that simply don't
need extra decision making responsibilities, or don't personally
feel comfortable with empowerment. If a task is quite difficult
or controversial an employee may not feel adequately trained to
assume the new tasks. With complex jobs there simply may not be
sufficient time to train in an employee. In a company that is down-sizing,
or heading towards a merger or acquisition, employee empowerment
can either over-whelming or tenuous in the long term (4). To delegate
is to assume a certain level of trust in the person who will take
on the new task. Both parties must be able to handle the responsibility
that goes with empowerment.
Delegation time-line
For all but the most basic tasks it's often easier for managers
to ease workers into handling more responsibility. By succeeding
at ever more challenging tasks an employer can develop more trust
in a worker. Incremental steps can avoid the significant disappointment
by both managers and their workers when early attempts at transferring
responsibility don't proceed as expected.
A manager should start the delegation process with a carefully
thought out plan as to which worker will assume the new responsibilities,
form a mental snapshot of the desirable outcomes, and come up with
a set of procedures for handling mistakes. Explaining new tasks
for the selected employee should be done carefully and patiently.
After asking for feed-back, a manager may have to slightly alter
the original plans. The more buy-in on the part of the workers the
better the final outcomes. Even though a manager will have a certain
expectation of the final result, the path the employee takes to
get there should be somewhat flexible. Both parties should work
in a quiet space where there are not distractions from other workers
or customers. It may be necessary to formally write down the tasks
so that both parties can review them at a latter date.
Some companies hold monthly staff meetings to keep employees informed
of production quotas and sales. If combined with free breakfasts
more employees will be encouraged to attend!
Evolution of management style
During the transition stage where responsibility is gradually moved
into the hands of the employee, a manager will need to maintain
a high level of respect and encouragement for the changes being
implemented. Good managers are now being called coaches, advisors,
or even facilitators (5). This new form of administration challenges
the hierarchical forms of leadership where the final authority was
at the top of the tower watching over workers below. Managers have
the power and capacity to influence the behavior of their employees.
Responsibilities must be shared through trust, assurance, motivation
and support. Work-related decisions and full control of the work
is being pushed down towards the lowest operating levels of most
businesses.
The basics of employee empowerment have to start at the top. Managers
can't expect employees to begin solving problems and making improvements
unless they see that the executive group will support change from
below. Workers may request travel of education funding to attend
conferences and specialized training. If managers don't provide
the employee the time away from the day-to-day job to attend these
events, delegation probably won't proceed smoothly. After a gaining
a new skill, a manger should be willing to allow the employee to
assume the responsibility of the new tasks or procedures, largely
with-out direct supervision from the administration.
Listening to workers
Another principle of employee empowerment that strongly affects
communication channels within a company is the "twenty foot
rule." This rule states (6) that the best people to solve a
problem are those people who work within twenty feet of the issue.
Many conflicts in organizations result from vague language or expectations.
When managers describe specific behavior, employees will be better
able to understand problems and develop ways to improve them. Conflicts
between administrators and workers need to be taken care of quickly.
If an employee does is not allowed sufficient latitude in determining
the course of events, or if the manager steps in too frequently,
the delegation process will proceed slowly or not at all.
Recognize success
Managers that show their appreciation for performance enhancement
of their workers are often held in high esteem. Garden center managers
can reward their best sales staff with paid travel trips to national
trade shows. Field workers can be offered the chance to attend regional
educational trade conferences. In the Pacific Northwest wholesale
nursery managers will often reward their best Spanish workers buy
sending them to the annually held Farwest Show Seminars (7) in August
in Portland, OR. At this large trade show there are seminars held
in Spanish on all phases integrated pest management.
Upon completion of the assigned task, both parties should reflect
back on the transfer of responsibility. If the delegation proceeded
smoothly, the employee will generally have a much keener interest
in taking on new tasks. Most employees, if given the right opportunity,
like to expand their skills. A renewed sense of autonomy, and self-worth,
should keep a employee for many years to come.
Team empowerment
When an organization delegates authority from the bottom up, to
groups or teams of workers, the process of decentralization will
result in the entire organization working better. A group of individuals
working together can accomplish more than the sum total of individual
workers. This synergy is what drives group work in an organization.
The range of skills provided by a group of workers and the inherent
self-monitoring which each group performs makes it a reasonably
safe recipient for delegated empowerment (8).
Just as there a multitude of different type of nurserymen, so are
there different types of teams (9). A team can have fixed positions,
such as case with a baseball team. Each member of this type of team
has well defined tasks, which as a rule don't over-lap with other
members of the team. While a wholesale nursery may have sales team,
a greenhouse team, and a container team, it's possible that team
members don't know or interact with one another.
Conversely, a football team generally works cohesively in order
to win the game. Team members are beholden to the word of the coach
or the team captain. Solo performance is only called for when a
game win is required. In retail garden center the supervisor of
the floral department may be considered a team captain.
Thirdly, in a game of doubles tennis the teams are very small,
and each member covers one another. Team members have considerable
flexibility in how they perform their job, and individual members
contribute, rather than perform. In a landscape architecture business,
a small staff of associates, each with individual types of creativity,
can essentially perform a company design standard of outdoor architecture.
|
Coming together is beginning, keeping together
is progress, and working together is success. -Henry Ford
|
While there is no set standard for designing teams, the combined
effect of working together on a common goal far outweigh the effectiveness
of individuals working alone.
Successful delegation can be thought of as the ultimate win-win
scenario. Managers gain from the
tremendous expertise of their workers, and employees take home the
self satisfaction of implementing their own ideas towards an issue
that results in successful fruition.
References
1. Empowerment
and delegation. 2001. Gregorio Billikopf Encina, University
of California. In: Labor
Management in Agriculture Cultivating Personnel Productivity, 2nd
Edition.
2. Delegation: More than just propping up your feet. 1995. Steven
Stovall. Nursery Retailer,
July-August 1995.
3. Supervising
agricultural work. 2002. Howard Rosenburg, University of California
at Berkeley. In: Ag
Help Wanted: Guidelines for Managing Agricultural Labor.
4. An
overview of employee empowerment: Do's and don'ts. 2000. Helosia
Fragoso, Indiana University, Division of Business and Economics.
5.
Employee empowerment starts at the top. 1991. Joan Lloyd at
Work.
6. Improving
employee empowerment. 1996. Leslie Hildula, 1996. The CPA Journal.
7. Farwest
Show Seminars. 2004. Oregon Association
of Nurseries, Wilsonville, OR.
8. Groups
that work. Gerard Blair. Senior lecturer in the Department of
Electrical Engineering, University of Edinburgh.
9. There's
more than one kind of team. 1996. Peter F. Drucker, from: The
Wall Street Journal. Course reading for a class in Business Administration
at Northeastern University in Boston, MA.
First posted:
December, 2004
|